Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 6,292
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2014, 5:55 am
Remember how cool it was when the Third Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:01 pm
ShareMind-reading police officers, guns made of marshmallows, and a Woody Allen mockumentary all made rhetorical appearances during Tuesday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm
In 2008, the Project sued the state agency, accusing it of concentrating its efforts in areas mainly populated by minorities. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
United States, Dred Scott v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 11:34 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 8:21 am
United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:38 am
In Fullilove v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 3:50 pm
In other Public Defender news, the 9th Circuit blog has a post entitled "Gonzales: DOJ agrees Ninth Circuit precedent on minor offenses is flawed" and that the Department of Justice has conceded that the Ninth Circuit should grant rehearing en banc to correct United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:17 pm
In a 49-page decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled 2-1 to overturn a federal law banning public television stations from accepting public issue and political advertising.In Minority Television Project, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm
Whether all reasonable steps have been taken will be fact-specific and the hurdle is a high one; the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) stated in its Statutory Code of Practice that “an employer would be considered to have taken all reasonable steps if there were no further steps that they could have been expected to take…” The scope of the defence was recently considered by the employment tribunal (ET) in Fischer v London United Busways Ltd,… [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:22 am
On 27 July 2022, in RT France v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 12:55 pm
Although this opinion is not binding on California courts, it was authored by then-Judge Samuel Alito, who is now a justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 6:00 am
We don't know what that title means; we just wanted to draw some mathematicians to our blog.Well, no.Actually, we just read United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:09 pm
State) and national origin (e.g., Korematsu v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm
In this respect, the Court recalls its case-law to the effect that a Contracting State is considered to retain Convention liability in respect of treaty commitments and other agreements between States subsequent to the entry into force of the Convention (see, for example, Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498/08, §§ 126-128, ECHR 2010-…). [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
United States, and can be read here. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am
The case involving the REDSKINS mark is currently on hold until the United States Supreme Court decides the In re Tam case. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 3:21 pm
Disparate impact was established United States Supreme Court as Ricci v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
Trump v. [read post]
