Search for: "United States v. Stevens" Results 2421 - 2440 of 4,056
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am by Kiran Bhat
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the Court considered whether copyrighted works made and purchased abroad can be bought and sold within the United States without the copyright owner’s permission. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
  We have had 460,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, India, Australia and Ireland making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:27 pm by Bill Araiza
  If the Second Amendment is incorporated against the states does that mean that Alaskans have fewer Second Amendment rights because the "right [that] was understood at the time" that Alaska was admitted was presumably the understanding in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 8:55 am by Victoria Kwan
Meanwhile, Justice Stevens was in Washington, D.C., for a conversation hosted by Alliance for Justice and George Washington University, where he criticized the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” In The New Jersey Law Journal (registration or subscription required), Steven Sanders discusses Beckles v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:30 am by Lisa McElroy
United States, one of three cases seeking an interpretation of the federal “honest services” fraud statute. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am by Mark Walsh
“Does [due process] require a ‘nexus’ between the United States and a non-resident alien to apply to him extraterritorially a federal criminal statute? [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:08 am by Erin Miller
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports that the State of Washington filed its brief yesterday in Doe #1 v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:39 am by Steve Hall
The United States Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that states cannot execute mentally handicapped people. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 10:36 am by Abbott & Kindermann
This issue came before the United States Supreme Court in the form of a submerged lands case from the State of Florida. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:58 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Second Circuit said that “rather than looking to the identity of the parties, the type of security at issue, or whether each individual defendant engaged in conduct within the United States, we hold that a securities transaction is domestic when the parties incur irrevocable liability to carry out the transaction within the United States or when title is passed with the United States. [read post]