Search for: "Williams v. Justice Court" Results 2421 - 2440 of 5,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Bazarsky, The Future of PennsylvaniaProducts Liability as Applied by Federal and State Courts: Covell v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
Down in DC, the Supreme Court accepted cert in a followup to its decision last year in Graham v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Council of State Governments Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen looks at the recent cert grant PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 9:22 pm by Norm Pattis
William Petit, who must somehow find a way to survive these crimes. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:22 am by SHG
Tennessee in 1991, for instance, the court overruled a 1987 decision, Booth v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Days later, the British chargé d’affaires in Washington met with Secretary of State John Quincy Adams to demand that the Monroe administration take action against South Carolina, which continued to jail free Black sailors for the duration of their vessel’s stay in port, even though eight months earlier Supreme Court Justice William Johnson had held the requirement unconstitutional in Elkison v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[5][6] Justice Thomas’s plurality opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Williams, 05-1256 The Court's decision in Philip Morris accomplished more tort reform in one day (and in a breezy 10 pages) than the Republican Congress did in 12 years, and left a dissenting Justice Stevens pleading (without intended irony) for "judicial restraint. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:06 am by J. Gordon Hylton
While denying his fellow Federalist William Marbury his commission as a justice of the peace of the District of Columbia—a commission issued by former Secretary of State John Marshall! [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Ramirez, Justice William Rehnquist said that Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment – which was arguably intended to protect the voting rights of freed slaves by sanctioning states that disenfranchised them – exempts disenfranchisement based on a felony conviction. [read post]