Search for: "Witt" Results 2421 - 2440 of 4,101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2017, 8:03 am by Samuel Moyn
On this blog, Ben Wittes had already acknowledged that this national security-friendly space was suddenly in the novel position of advertising the dangers of the national security state, bringing to the surface commitments the demand for just security that normally remained implicit. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 3:30 am by Anthony Sebok
Some, like John Witt, Lawrence Friedman, and Mort Horwitz, focus on changes in material conditions. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:11 am by Lorenzo Vidino
The legal elements of designating the Muslim Brotherhood also present complicated challenges, which have been explored by Benjamin Wittes, William McCants, and Ed Stein elsewhere on Lawfare. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 10:30 am by Quinta Jurecic
Benjamin Wittes chats with Norm about the Emoluments Clause, the lawsuit, and what all this has to do with national security. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:53 am by Jordan Brunner
Trump, Emma Kohse summarized it, and Benjamin Wittes reviewed the two big questions at issue in the Trump case, and how they were handled by the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:20 am by Jordan Brunner
” (Later, he also selectively misquoted Benjamin Wittes’s review of the Ninth Circuit’s decision.) [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 7:00 am by Jillian Schwedler
As William McCants and Benjamin Wittes argued recently for Lawfare, most—if not all—of the Muslim Brotherhood's manifold operations would fail to meet the legal standard for material support for terrorism. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am by Ed Stein
The other day, Benjamin Wittes and Will McCants questioned whether the Trump administration could lawfully designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (“FTO”). [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:00 am by Jonathan Rauch
Like Lawfare's Ben Wittes, he's part of the Coalition of All Democratic Forces which so much depends on. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 5:48 pm by Nora Ellingsen
A little more than a week ago, Benjamin Wittes posted a piece about the malevolence and incompetence of Trump’s Executive Order on visas and refugees—an order that, in his words, is both wildly over-inclusive and wildly under-inclusive. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 11:19 am by Jordan Brunner
Benjamin Wittes and Susan Hennessey assured those concerned that Rick Ledgett’s retirement from the NSA was not a political protest. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:26 am by Quinta Jurecic
A week before the presidential election, Benjamin Wittes and I voiced concerns about the potential of the Trump movement to provide both a set of ideational preconditions from which an individual might move toward far-right extremism, and a social network for people drawn toward that extremism. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:33 am by Jordan Brunner
Jack Goldsmith shared his thoughts on why Yates’ reasons for not enforcing Trump’s refugee ban were weak and unpersuasive, and Benjamin Wittes argued that Yates should have resigned rather than refuse to enforce the order. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:32 am by Jordan Brunner
  ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Benjamin Wittes wrote a note to readers, new and old. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:48 am by Peter Spiro
It is malevolence tempered only by incompetence, as Ben Wittes puts it. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 10:54 am by Jordan Brunner
  ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Benjamin Wittes, Susan Hennessey, and Quinta Jurecic provided the full text of the draft State Department dissent channel memo on President Trump’s refugee and visa executive order. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 10:27 am by Walter Olson
More views from Ken White, Josh Blackman, Jonathan Adler, Jack Goldsmith, and Ben Wittes. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:56 am by Quinta Jurecic
The next in our series of book soirees at the Hoover Institution will take place from 5-7 pm tomorrow, Wednesday, February 1, when Benjamin Wittes will interview Edward Jay Epstein on his new book, How America Lost Its Secrets: Edward Snowden, the Man and the Theft. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:30 am by J. Dana Stuster
Lawfare’s editors and contributors have covered the order in detail: Benjamin Wittes analyzed the order at length, concluding that it does not serve its stated purpose of contributing to national security, and Adham Sahloul raised concerns about the effects this will have not just on the refugees it targets directly, but also humanitarian organizations that operate abroad. [read post]