Search for: "Court, U.S. Supreme Court" Results 2441 - 2460 of 99,558
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2024, 1:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
At the same time, the Supreme Court has said outright that "government speech is not restricted by the Free Speech Clause" of the First Amendment. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 10:49 am by Holly
A District Court Judge initially ruled that British limitation law would apply, however, the Supreme Court reversed and held that United States law would apply.[2]   How Does the Titanic Law Apply? [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am by admin
Many courts, however, limited Frye to novel devices, and in 1993, the Supreme Court, in Daubert,[5] rejected the legal claim that Rule 702 had incorporated the common law “general acceptance” test. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Supreme Court The SEC’s Proposed Safeguarding Rule Will Cost Investors Posted by R.J. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Supreme Court The SEC’s Proposed Safeguarding Rule Will Cost Investors Posted by R.J. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am by Gwendolyn Whidden
Israel’s Supreme Court yesterday halted government subsidies for many ultra-Orthodox men who do not serve in the army. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The California Supreme Court will issue a final ruling on the matter, which Eastman can appeal. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 9:00 pm
This Essay explores the extent to which political and civil rights in the North Carolina Constitution have been enforced by the state supreme court in modern times. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Wednesday, March 27, affirmed a district court’s decision invalidating the claims of two of Trading Technologies’ (TT’s) patents as being patent ineligible under Section 101 and also clarified the application of a 2018 Supreme Court ruling on foreign damages. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Wednesday, March 27, affirmed a district court’s decision invalidating the claims of two of Trading Technologies’ (TT’s) patents as being patent ineligible under Section 101 and also clarified the application of a 2018 Supreme Court ruling on foreign damages. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 7:27 am by Dennis Crouch
Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398 (2007), the Supreme Court discussed situations where a combination of prior art elements would be considered obvious: When a work is available in one field of endeavor, design incentives and other market forces can prompt variations of it, either in the same field or a different one. [read post]