Search for: "Department of Insurance v. Doe" Results 2441 - 2460 of 2,944
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, does not appear to have gone on record as vehemently opposing Roe v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
The year 2019 is ending with the great rifts--opened in 2016, exposed in 2017, and acquiring a greater urgency and revealing the power of its consequences in 2018--now exposed. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:58 am by Liam Thornton
  This decision shows an even more progressive interpretation to EU citizenship and residency law than set down in Chen & Ors. v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] ECR I-9925 . [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 3:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
” The states’ brief in the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
The VA interpreted the purposes language to mean that it does not have to comply with the requirement unless limiting competition is necessary to meet the goals. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
But even if I did find anti-commodification principles attractive, I would find the Department’s proposed rule with regard to PBSCs difficult to square with the fact that NOTA does not prohibit the buying and selling of either blood and plasma or sperm and ova, where any dangers of commodification should be heightened. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The statute, though, does not mention officers. [read post]
23 May 2019, 10:10 am by Rachel Casper
Rarely, if ever, does a law firm notify clients at this juncture. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
Provincial Government of MarinduqueDocket: 09-944Issue(s): Whether federal courts have jurisdiction to rule on a case that involves potential foreign policy issues because a foreign government is involved.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' supplemental briefPetitioners' reply Title: Louisiana Safety Association of Timbermen – Self Insurers Fund v. [read post]