Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 2441 - 2460 of 9,566
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2011, 9:12 am by blacklobellolaw
 A foreclosure of a deed of trust does not require that a court case be filed. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 11:01 am by Dennis Crouch
Regarding the 35 USC § 101 rejection, the PTAB determined that claim 1 was directed to an abstract idea of “mathematical concepts and concepts that can be practically performed in the human mind or with the assistance of pen and paper (including an observation, evaluation, judgment, opinion). [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:01 am by James Yang
  Even if the novelty search does not uncover any relevant prior art references, then the search does not guarantee that the invention will be patented. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 7:06 pm by Kurt R. Karst
§ 156(d)(1) does not apply here because the approval was transmitted on a business day (a Friday) before 4:30 pm Eastern Time. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:00 pm
Although the plan calls for the most sweeping tax reform since 1986 it does not cut revenues. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
"Lord Bingham identified two stages in the enquiry: (1) whether the evidence is assumed (provisionally) to be true, and if so, legally admissible; and (2) whether evidence or some of it (and if so which parts of it), which ex hypothesi is legally admissible, should be admitted. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 10:44 pm
" "Special Interrogatory No. 2 asks: 'Please state the amount of such damages as identified in interrogatory number 1.'  Clement's objections this time were (1) that this Special Interrogatory violates [section] 2030.060[, subdivision] (d) because it is not full and complete in itself, requiring, as it does, reference to the answer to an earlier interrogatory in the same set. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann
In objecting to the granting of a 40 percent density bonus, plaintiffs presented two main arguments: 1) section 65915 does not permit a 40 percent density bonus, and 2) the calculations of the density bonus were incorrect. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 11:01 am by Oliver
Claim 1 of this request reads as follows: 1. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:36 am by Stephen Jenei
Additional guidance on patent subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:05 pm
You pay (1-x)% of something, and we pay x% of it. [read post]
31 May 2024, 10:44 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 253 and concluded that “the invalidity of … claim 1 because of double patenting, even if true, does not necessarily require the invalidation of claims 5, 19, 40, and 43. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Sharon D. Nelson and John W. Simek
And yet here we were (as of October 2022) with only 30-35% of people in the office full time. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 12:49 pm by Jim Walker
  However, the cruise lines and its trade organization, the Cruise Line International Association (CLIA), claim that the man overboard technology does not exist. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 2:31 pm by Karina Fuentes
§ 922(g)(1), Dantey Tucker was sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment based on the sentencing enhancement set forth in the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. [read post]