Search for: "Does 1-43"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 4,488
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Nev. 2005); 3 McCarthy on Trademarks § 18:43 (4th ed. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Nev. 2005); 3 McCarthy on Trademarks § 18:43 (4th ed. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:57 am
’ (Report, pp. 43-44). [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:23 am
Does your child’s school have a written policy for head injuries and other serious injuries? [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:50 am
(If you are new to the Unitary Patent, Merpel regrets that the IPKat has not written about it much for a while, because there has not been much in the way of news, but relevant posts are this from the 2014 Fordham conference, this on the applicable law, and this on Spain's challenge to the legality of it all.)Well, Merpel has now received from a number of sources a document "Proposals for the level of renewal fees for European patents with unitary effect", submitted by the President… [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:03 am
“Thus, identifying Marley or whoever holds the rights to his persona in the alternative does not render the survey data useless or irrelevant. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:00 am
A proposed timeline is contained in Annex 1.ARGUMENTSA. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
SECTION 1-201. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
Thus, a project opponent simply showing substantial evidence supporting a “fair argument” that an otherwise-exempt project may have significant adverse environmental impacts does not defeat an exemption – the opponent must also make a “factual” showing to the satisfaction of the lead agency that “unusual circumstances” exist and have resulted in the potentially significant impacts. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:28 am
What it does do is give subcontractors and suppliers a bit more negotiating room knowing that any prospective lien waivers will be null and void after July 1 of this year. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:14 pm
So what does that tell us? [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
For instance, articles 42 and 43 addressed the procedures for execution and levy, and article 45 outlined the procedures for enforcement through supplementary proceedings. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:45 am
One of these powers was securing the property rights of authors at the federal level because, as James Madison would explain in the Federalist Papers, “the States cannot separately make effectual provisions for” this protection. 1Federalist 43. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 8:16 am
Menacing in the Second Degree, New York Penal Law 120.14(1), is one such crime. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:31 pm
No rule of grammar, logic, or the law compels such a reading. 748 F.3d at 342-43 [citation omitted]. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 9:23 am
This time it does respond, but late, and only with a cursory denial which the FCC does not find credible. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:27 pm
Ltd & ors (No 3) [2007] UKHL 21, [2008] 1 AC 1, when Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones sought to prevent the publication and use of unauthorised photographs taken at their wedding. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm
Early support for this assumption was provided by Bean J in Cooke & Midland Heart Ltd v MGN [2014] EMLR 31 at [43]: I do not accept that in every case evidence will be required to satisfy the serious harm test. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
First, does s. 43(1)(c) create a distinction based on age, and second, if so, does this distinction create a disadvantage by perpetuating prejudice or stereotyping? [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:26 pm
He does not challenge the rejections of claims 6-14 and 16-33.In re Imes, at *1-2. [read post]
