Search for: "Does 1-71" Results 2441 - 2460 of 2,540
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
We find no reversible error, and affirm the judgment. fn. 1 BACKGROUND According to plaintiff, he and two companions, Jim Walker and Bill D'Honau, were walking along a downtown Palo Alto street in the early morning hours of {Slip Opn. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
ROOTS The Legality of an American Slavery Introduction February 1 is known as National Freedom Day in the U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am by Guest Author
The godword “democratic” is prominently featured in Novak’s title—and his project, as he informs us on his opening page, is a critical chapter in the “legal-political history of American democracy” (1). [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000, at para. 71, cited by the majority in this case at para. 41 of its reasons). [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
However, a 28 percent federal corporate income tax rate combined with Biden’s proposal to tax long-term capital gains and qualified dividends at an ordinary income tax rate of 39.6 percent for income earned over $1 million would make the top integrated tax rate on corporate income in the U.S. the highest in the OECD at 62.7 percent (see Figure 3).[13] If the Biden tax plan were fully implemented, the U.S. rank on the Tax Foundation’s International Tax Competitiveness Index… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
App. 2005). 1 The City appealed the original jury verdict, and the case was heard by the Court of Appeals of Ohio inHilliard v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
”[1] – ‘Stable Diffusion Litigation’ (website created by attorneys on behalf of the artists) “If a work is transformative…then it’s not a violation of copyright and the plaintiff simply has no ground on which to stand to file a copyright infringement case…[T]hose who refuse to acknowledge advancements in technology and instead fight against them are like whittlers mad at power tools. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:27 am by Vercammen Law
The Administrator asserts that Wells Fargo, at which Decedent maintained the majority of his assets, is liable for the improper transfers.1 The 2013 POA is attached to the certification of Justin M. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:07 am by Peter Mahler
I recently had the privilege of speaking to an audience of judges of the New York Supreme Court Commercial Division at Fordham Law School’s Eileen Bransten Institute on Complex Commercial Litigation. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:47 am by Bill Otis
  But with error sure to happen, the only realistic questions  are what kind of damage should we be willing to accept when it does, and who should have to bear the risk? [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:45 am by Oona A. Hathaway
Article 1 of the Charter sets out the purposes of the U.N., including, first: To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which… [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:29 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Act does provide far broader protections to journalists from warrants, wiretaps, or production orders under s. 488.02(5) of the Criminal Code. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:27 am by Kevin LaCroix
But while the Court found that the rule insulates directors ad officers from claims of negligence concerning the wisdom of their judgment, it does not foreclose negligence claims against them alleging that their decision making was made without deliberation or the requisite diligence, or in bad faith. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am by Jasmine Joseph
An uneasy standoff exists between the constitutional antidiscrimination standard, which requires proof of discriminatory intent, and the statutory antidiscrimination standard, which does not. [read post]