Search for: "Don Jones" Results 2441 - 2460 of 5,381
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2013, 6:46 am by Jim Sedor
Jones has offered conflicting explanations of what type of work the group does. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 12:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
I don’t know enough of the facts to opine on a bottom line, but here’s the general legal analysis: 1. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 7:21 am by emagraken
Although the  UK Supreme Court has recently stripped away at expert witness immunity the BC Courts don’t appear to be willing to do so. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 11:12 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Just as long as there is no subsidence, we don’t want to be throwing money away do we? [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:00 pm by George Smith
Aides change someone’s Depends, change a catheter or turn somebody every few hours, but teeth often don’t get brushed twice a day. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 7:41 pm by Orin Kerr
It’s somewhat easier to reach the result that No Trespassing signs don’t matter if you see the license as an issue of law; you just announce that the license does not consider such signs. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 6:39 am by Roy Black
Of course, some have the voice of Billy Graham or James Earl Jones but those are few and far between. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 6:42 am by Dan Harris
Then a Canadian lawyer, Paul Jones, wrote what I consider to have been the best answer: For me it depends first on the most likely type of dispute, the desired remedies and the location of assets. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/007bb3Sx1J -> Eyepartner Wins Injunction Against Kor Media for Copyright http://t.co/r5yE9EiAeA -> Webcam spying goes mainstream as Miss Teen USA describes hack http://t.co/ZMcyHmat2j -> Copyhype Friday’s Endnotes – 08/16/13 http://t.co/05E6ghmlUH -> Robin Thicke sues for pre-emptive copyright protection of 'Blurred Lines' http://t.co/gsBmqspd3j -> Liability under US CDA limited say court in Jones v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 6:43 am by Cleveland Law Library
 Pamela Jones, the person behind the blog, wrote “No matter how good the motives might be for collecting and screening everything we say to one another, and no matter how ‘clean’ we all are ourselves from the standpoint of the screeners, I don’t know how to function in such an atmosphere,” Read the full story here. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
Recently, the Ontario Court of Appeal linked that jurisprudence to an examination of informational privacy in Jones v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Courtney Minick
For eight years, a battle has raged in the Southern Ocean. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 12:11 am by Tessa Shepperson
The only way to end it is to serve a section 21 notice and then (if the tenants don’t move out) issue Court proceedings for possession. [read post]