Search for: "Downs v State"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 40,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2012, 5:00 am
Here's another one from the vault -- Sturges v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
What this case may come down to is what the phrase “lawfully made under this title” in §109(a) actually means. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
What this case may come down to is what the phrase “lawfully made under this title” in §109(a) actually means. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
What this case may come down to is what the phrase “lawfully made under this title” in §109(a) actually means. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:48 am
State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 2:15 pm
Sadly, this is the classic “Finality v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 11:57 am
The Court was divided 5-4 in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 1:17 pm
Judge Burns (down here in San Diego) should clearly have discussed all four factors -- not just three of them -- in deciding whether to grant the plaintiff's Rule 60(b) motion for relief from dismissal. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:09 am
The trial judge, in this bench trial, stated the court would not consider the statement as evidence to establish that C.H. was raped. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Bauman, et al. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 1:01 am
Supreme Court handed down its decision on the case McCleskey v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 9:15 am
Thayer Ninth Circuit Strikes Down Contract Amendment Without Notice–Douglas v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 4:05 am
As previously reported, last month in Garcia v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 5:00 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 12:45 pm
The court struck down the ban on all three of these grounds. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:10 am
This month, a Superior Court judge, in the case of UMNV 205-207 Newbury, LLC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:35 am
The recent case of Towe v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 7:03 am
The Court used a formula laid down in the 1989 decision in Teague v. [read post]
