Search for: "Fail v. State" Results 2441 - 2460 of 66,281
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2009, 12:34 pm
On May 19, 2009, the Michigan Court of Appeals released its published opinion in Averill v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
ATTORNEY FAILED TO EXPLAIN AWAY YEAR-LONG DELAYAfter HGL was injured in a motorcycle accident, he filed suit against TMM and other defendants in the Queens County Supreme Court.When the latter moved to dismiss the litigation, claiming that HGL’s injuries weren’t “serious,” as defined by the state’s Insurance Law, HGL failed to oppose the motion.About a year later, after HGL moved to vacate his default, and the Supreme Court denied that… [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:04 pm
Someone asked how the case I reviewed in Mother Fails In Using Paternity Affidavit Against "Father" when Seger v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by ASAD KHAN
Either way it was best not to express a full view as Rhuppiah’s case failed in any event. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 8:20 am by Howard M. Wasserman
” Allen failed to identify any historical evidence that anyone at the founding contemplated damages lawsuits against states for copyright infringement. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:09 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The lower court dismissed the action and the appellate division affirmed simply stating "the petitioner failed to exhaust its administrative remedies before commencing this proceeding (see Village Law § 7-712-a[5][b]; Matter of White v Incorporated Vil. of Plandome Manor, 190 AD2d 854; see also Matter of Capitol Distribs. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:09 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The lower court dismissed the action and the appellate division affirmed simply stating "the petitioner failed to exhaust its administrative remedies before commencing this proceeding (see Village Law § 7-712-a[5][b]; Matter of White v Incorporated Vil. of Plandome Manor, 190 AD2d 854; see also Matter of Capitol Distribs. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:43 am
Tenth Circuit Courtroom.jpg In drug and firearm trial, admission of detective's expert testimony on gang behavior was erroneous because the trial court failed, after defendant objected to the evidence, to make specific findings on the record reflecting that it had performed its gatekeeper duty on expert testimony, including whether the proffered expert evidence rested on a reliable foundation and was relevant; the error was harmless in light of other evidence… [read post]