Search for: "Fee v. Fee"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 31,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2013, 11:38 am
Opinions Although time records are not always required, at least some documents must support the calculation of attorneys fees CITY OF LAREDO, TEXAS v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 7:17 am
On January 31, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court denied a motion to waive fees in Woods v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 7:58 am
On January 19, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court denied a motion to waive fees in Davis v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 7:53 am
Butchok filed a statutory attorney’s fee lien and attempted to recover his contingency fee on a settlement offer that had been made by the ... [read post]
21 May 2020, 6:52 am
Horn an award of attorneys’ fees ... [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 12:33 pm
Recently, the Ontario Divisional Court released their decision in Gilbert’s LLP v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:07 pm
Quigley v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:30 am
Wilkinson v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:34 am
In a May 9, 2014 opinion (here), the Court held in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 4:33 pm
In Ellis v. [read post]
31 May 2009, 6:34 pm
While it is clear that the child support or spousal support obligations are not dischargeable in bankruptcy as domestic support obligations, the question of attorneys fees granted in a child support or other proceeding in Family Court was less clear cut until Ross v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:21 am
See Glasser v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:57 am
In its November 5, 2009 opinion in Ogle v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:41 am
Homer v Homer, 2022 WL 4290465 (S.D. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 2:11 pm
On September 26, 2008, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania decided Hansen v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:04 am
Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:17 am
After reading Willis v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 2:33 am
Gabbanelli Accordions & Imports, L.L.C. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 5:55 pm
Fincher v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:16 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously in Jones v. [read post]
