Search for: "His Law v. USA" Results 2441 - 2460 of 3,297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2011, 12:18 am by Marie Louise
195/09 Synthon BV v Merz Pharma GmbH & Co KG (The SPC Blog) Amrix (Cyclobenzaprine) – US: Eurand files patent infringement complaint against Anchen in response to Para IV certification (Patent Docs) Asacol (Mesalamine) – US: NJ District Court punts in Asacol DJ action to trigger 180-day exclusivity forfeiture; Rules that subsequent ANDA applicant lacks standing: Medeva Pharma Suisse v Par Pharmaceuticals (FDA Law Blog) Cialis (Tadalafil) – Israel:… [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 7:14 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
A very recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada has held that a court may properly dismiss an action arising from an international commercial agreement, even after the defendant has filed a Statement of Defence:  Momentous.ca Corp. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 6:57 am by Thomas Heintzman
A very recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada has held that a court may properly dismiss an action arising from an international commercial agreement, even after the defendant has filed a Statement of Defence:  Momentous.ca Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Lee Davis
  Government’s Exhibit List USA v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:14 am by Bob Kraft
” The National Law Journal (10/13, Mauro) reports that David Frederick, a partner at Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, is representing the family of Hannah Bruesewitz in the case, Bruesewitz v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:17 am by Bob Kraft
" The National Law Journal (10/13, Mauro) reports that David Frederick, a partner at Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, is representing the family of Hannah Bruesewitz in the case, Bruesewitz v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 5:00 am by South Florida Lawyers
The complaint alleges, without elaboration, that “[v]isco-elastic foam mattresses comprise a relevant product market, or submarket, separate and distinct from the market for mattresses generally, under the federal antitrust laws. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 8:23 am by Jayne Ponder
 As Justice Thomas reflected in his recent statement on the denial of certiorari in Malwarebytes, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for USA Today, Eugene Scalia maintains that “Kavanaugh’s interest in administrative law tells us that he is intensely engaged with questions that arise constantly in his current court and at the Supreme Court, … that he is thinking about the roles of Congress, the executive branch, and the courts in regulating our daily lives. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 8:10 am by V.Venkatesan
” In this statement of law lies the genesis of PILs of the future.Erusian Equipment & Chemicals Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Having shopped his allegations to a variety of regulatory agencies who have taken no action, Mr. [read post]