Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS" Results 2441 - 2460 of 7,539
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2022, 9:49 pm by Dennis Crouch
As the Court held, a public official does not enjoy a right of privacy protecting him from criticism except in the case of “actual malice,” which is “the publication of false information ‘with knowledge of its falsity or in reckless disregard of the truth. [read post]
2 May 2009, 3:59 am
When decisions that should have been taken by government officials are delegated (wholly or in part) to private contractors without appropriate oversight, the public interest is jeopardized. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 11:06 am by Michael C. Dorf
Congress should exercise that power, sweeping aside state law obstacles to the participation of state and local officials in the enforcement of a national lockdown.To be sure, a 1997 Supreme Court decision forbids Congress or the President from ordering state and local officials to enforce federal law, but nothing in the Constitution forbids those officials from voluntarily doing so—and they likely would, especially if bipartisan legislation reimbursed state… [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 11:56 am
A one line affirmance of the decision below is common in such circumstances, if memory serves. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:02 am by Joe Consumer
Company officials created the conditions that led to the accident, then withheld the information about its seriousness from the public, state and federal officials for two days. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:02 am by Joe Consumer
Company officials created the conditions that led to the accident, then withheld the information about its seriousness from the public, state and federal officials for two days. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 8:04 am
"I guess I would just ask that you stay tuned with regard to these and know that we're thinking about them. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:00 am by The Book Review Editor
My orders are to get the right information to the people who make the decisions. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 5:25 am
Lozano, Wyoming State Public Defender; Tina N. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 5:25 am
Lozano, Wyoming State Public Defender; Tina N. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 7:40 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Dad, my sitting here today, in the US Capitol talking to our elected officials is proof that you made the right decision forty years ago to leave the Soviet Union and come here to United State of America in search of a better life for our family. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 3:58 am by SHG
Indeed, we would never know their real thoughts, as their only public utterances would be hidden in the mitigated language of rulings and the occasional official platitude. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:18 am
As explained in Wyatt, however, private parties such as the BCBS Defendants “hold no office requiring them to exercise discretion” and therefore extending immunity to them “would have no bearing on whether public officials are able to act forcefully and decisively in their jobs. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
What may need to be addressed prior to the appearance at the Court of Appeal are two motions brought by the official opposition, based on the following legislative standing orders: Matters out of order in debate 23. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 9:55 am by Elliot Harmon
The Public Interest Registry (PIR) board’s ability to veto nominated members would ensure that the council will not include members willing to challenge Ethos’ decisions. [read post]
10 May 2016, 6:31 am
 The Decision states it is to be published, but Merpel has not yet seen an official publication of it by the EPO. [read post]
15 Sep 2012, 10:04 am by David
Public records obtained by The Republic since publication of the special report reveal other developments. [read post]