Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: A. C., A CHILD"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 4,774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
My husband and fellow law professor Michael C. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:19 pm
G’s will made a $20,000 devise to his child, A. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:00 pm
(c) [More Than One Substitute Gift; Which One Takes.] [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 6:27 am
For those with a deep interest in this subject, click on the link to read the PDF of the report issued by the Office of the Child Advocate of the State of Connecticut. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 2:00 am
On Wednesday 18 March it will hand down judgment in the following: R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions on whether the Benefit Cap (Housing Benefit) Regulations 2012 are unlawful owing to disproportionately affecting single parents and domestic violence victims, who tend to be women, and also whether they fail to have regard to the best interests of the child; BP Shipping Ltd & Anor v Braganza involving the investigations carried out by the respondent… [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 10:00 pm
For those with a deep interest in this subject, click on the link to read the PDF of the report issued by the Office of the Child Advocate of the State of Connecticut. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 10:00 pm
For those with a deep interest in this subject, click on the link to read the PDF of the report issued by the Office of the Child Advocate of the State of Connecticut. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:35 pm
The recent changes to the CIS form anticipate these possible scenarios by the adding of certain questions under the “Additional Information” section of Part C (Income). [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:49 am
The Court must be vigilant to mark out its disapproval of conduct of that type in a positive way and give proper weight to the interests involved in a particular case and in the wider community and indeed the international concerns which cases of this type frequently attract”[2]Prevention is better than cureIt is always better to prevent a child being abducted than to then go through the process… [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:00 am
Family Code §4320 (c)] Although Section 4320(c) speaks of earning capacity, the code does not specifically define what it means. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 7:05 pm
Or sort of no exception: there is a divorce-related exception for IRAs if you transfer your interest in the IRA to a spouse or former spouse, and the transfer is under a divorce or separation agreement. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
A child is like a sponge. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 7:39 pm
After G executed her will, she had another child, C. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:18 pm
If the marriage ends in divorce, a spouse who sacrificed his or her financial-earning opportunities to contribute so-called domestic services to the marital enterprise (such as child-rearing and homemaking) stands to be recompensed. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:49 pm
Caretaking functions include but are not limited to all of the following: (a) satisfying the nutritional needs of the child, managing the child’s bedtime and wake- up routines, caring for the child when sick or injured, being attentive to the child’s personal hygiene needs including washing, grooming, and dressing, playing with the child and arranging for recreation, protecting the child’s physical safety, and providing… [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:06 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015)The High Commissioner for Human Rights, Zeid Ra'ad al Hussein, has delivered his Report to the Human Rights Council on the activities of his office. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 8:40 am
C. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 12:00 am
It is in the best interest of the child to grant such visitation; b. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 3:48 pm
The Court only took this approach because the Court had before it a companion custody matter, wherein the Court could exercise control in the best interest of the child. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 11:46 am
Accordingly, in his balancing of interests for the purposes of determining whether a preliminary injunction is warranted, he stresses (pp. 118-19) that the injunction does notrequire DHS to begin removing or “prosecuting” the aliens in question. [read post]
