Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 9,831
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2020, 4:36 am
You can argue the point, but given that judges get to decide your client’s fate, it might not be the hill your client wishes to die on. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 1:17 am
Within a couple of hours of the German government's release of a draft patent "reform" bill (bearing the acronym "PatMoG"), this blog criticized the proposal as being "designed only to cement the status quo on injunctions. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
They’re not judges. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:10 am
On the other hand, this latest pivot is designed for people who should never be allowed to practice law. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:00 am
‘Scam PAC’ Treasurer Sentenced to Federal Prison Center for Public Integrity – Sarah Kleiner | Published: 2/21/2020 A federal judge sentenced political operative Scott Mackenzie to 12 months and one day in prison for making [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 4:42 am
If any archived pages are available, they’re pulled up in your browser automatically. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:16 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in a 1973 case, In re Bob Richards Chrysler-Plymouth Corp., involving the bankruptcy of the Bob Richards Chrysler-Plymouth car dealer. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:12 am
The biggest difference was Poly-America’s admission that it sold its bags on a wholesale level to several entities, and then those entities re-sold the orange drawstring bags under a wide variety of different brand names. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:00 am
You can get the answer to this question by using software specifically designed to cross-check a candidate’s reference list to make sure these are legitimate people. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am
There are pre-conditions to an effective rule of law, one that enables a stable and well-ordered society (“peace, order and good government”, as the Canadian constitution has it) that allows its economic, political and social systems to function: a general consensus to accept it and a general consensus that it matters; a trust that when laws may not be as they should be, they will be changed or, put another way, law is “fair” most of the time and there are ways to address it… [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 5:04 am
That’s what we’re excited about. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:17 am
It was intentionally designed by Congress to have a low threshold for success – if the officer finds that the person has just a “significant possibility” of winning their asylum claim, they’re placed into the next stage of the process. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:02 am
If you impose notice and takedown, I have to take it down b/c I’m in no position to judge. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
In this context, Good Samaritan and product design considerations are not distinguishable.] [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 8:25 am
In Re: Estate of John E. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am
“So, in this case the judge could say you (Jeffrey Rasawehr) can’t contact the petitioner, but any other restriction would have to be found to be libelous first? [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 6:30 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of the mark shown immediately below, for "wines; sparkling wines" in light of the registered mark DULCE VIDA for "distilled spirits"].In re Cracker Box Fireworks, LLC, Serial No. 88276676 (February 19, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 9:38 am
"Absent empirical data," Varadarajan concludes, "it is hard to know with certainty when a presumption of irreparable harm is optimal—helping to limit opportunistic behavior without chilling legitimate design-around activity. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am
There is no dispute that any alleged violation of the Settlement Enforcement Order has occurred outside the presence of the judge and is directed against the parti [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 9:04 am
A three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit agreed, issuing a judgment this past Wednesday affirming an injunction against imposition of the statutory requirements regarding LFOs on those ex-felons who are "genuinely unable to pay. [read post]
