Search for: "In Re: Mark M." Results 2441 - 2460 of 7,663
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2017, 8:52 am by Steve Baird
Please know that if you’re reading this now, whatever you’re thinking at the moment, I’m ever so thankful for you too, Happy Thankfulness and Gratitude! [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 2:31 am by Stan
If anyone chooses to re-post this with a sophomoric headline (I’m looking at you, Business Insider), I will not be held responsible. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:31 am by Gritsforbreakfast
House Corrections Committee Chairman Jerry Madden on Wednesday unveiled the committee substitute for his big, omnibus TDCJ bill, HB 3386; see the hearing online here beginning at the 48:30 mark, as well as Mike Ward's coverage in the Austin Statesman. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 10:15 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Number                                             Word Mark 7176226 FLYDREAM FEATHERS 7178103 NUTRAMIGEN 7175120 SCRAPS ROOTED IN COMPOST ROOTED IN COMPOST ROOTED IN COMPOST 7175088 SCRAPS ROOTED IN COMPOST 7175083 SCRAPS 7174815 UNBOX WHAT’S POSSIBLE 7174740 … [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:47 pm by Lara
I’m not sure what the Grange’s Mission is, but it does have a Declaration of Purposes, which includes the motto, “In essentials, unity; in non-essentials, liberty; in all things, charity. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:00 am by Brent Lorentz
  Because we’re involved in branding and trademarks, we (attorneys and mark holders) have a vested interest in maintaining the integrity of the information exchange. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 7:47 pm
Mark Penn (I'm reviewing his book for the Post, so it's much on my mind at the moment) notes that the punditocracy is more divided than the populace for this very reason:  "The myth that America is hopelessly 'polarized' gets perpetuated because in Washington D.C. -- where most of the pundits are writing from -- everyone has to choose sides to survive. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 10:48 pm by Jeff Gamso
[H]is obloquy sullied the public's perception of the profession.Even though the public wasn't there, didn't hear, didn't know.Hmmm.This isn't the Mark Gardner Rule which prohibits saying bad things about judges because they are always false even if they're true. [read post]
1 May 2016, 5:43 am by SHG
As long-time (or casual) readers of SJ may already be aware, I’m not a big fan of feelings. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 2:57 am by SHG
When Mark Greenbaum's Op-Ed in the L.A. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 5:04 am
Whose work am I marking? [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 2:00 am by Ruth Carter
Note: This post contains affiliate links, each marked with an asterisk (*). [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 7:19 am by Alex Aldridge
“It’ll be the f**king British Raj Mark 2! [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 9:00 am by Jorge Argota
Just as you’re about to fall, a safety net appears, saving you. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:24 am by Benjamin Wittes
Now we’re back–and Judge Pohl is reading something, presumably the Woods order, while trial counsel Commander Andrea Lockhart stands at the podium. [read post]