Search for: "In re A. V." Results 2441 - 2460 of 62,912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2023, 2:04 pm
But I must say that it's a little strange coming from an en banc decision in which Judge Bumatay's opinion on the matter gets outvoted 10-1, without a single judge on the en banc panel -- even those judges who typically vote alongside Judge Bumatay -- adopting his position in this one.Sometimes you're totally convinced you're right even though the rest of the world, including some very bright people, says you're wrong. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:42 pm
  And, in any event, maybe we're okay with defendants saying that they're innocent -- say, asserting that they didn't have the required means rea for the offense -- but also saying that, if they're guilty, it's nonetheless due to their mental health problems and hence qualify for diversion.Regardless, a prior opinion of the Court of Appeal held that pretrial diversion could be requested after trial, and today's opinion says it… [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:11 am
The latest Pennsylvania Bar Association Civil Litigation Update is out and it includes my case summary of Missett v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
 (ii) Are the defences raised in the infringement action res judicataOn this issue, Justice Khampepe held that the defences were not res judicata. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
 (ii) Are the defences raised in the infringement action res judicataOn this issue, Justice Khampepe held that the defences were not res judicata. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
 (ii) Are the defences raised in the infringement action res judicataOn this issue, Justice Khampepe held that the defences were not res judicata. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
 (ii) Are the defences raised in the infringement action res judicataOn this issue, Justice Khampepe held that the defences were not res judicata. [read post]