Search for: "LEVY V. LEVY" Results 2441 - 2460 of 3,418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm by Catriona Murdoch
Further indirect criticism was levied at the UK’s increasing use of electronic surveillance and the overly frequent authorisation (including self-authorisation) of “interception warrants”. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:16 pm
467/08, Padawan v SGAE in which the ECJ – to the contrary –stipulates that right holders should be “adequately” compensated for the use made of their protected works. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:13 am by Gordon Firemark
Activision (No Doubt sues over use of likeness in Band Hero) Lexology: http://tinyurl.com/6afzxzp Westlaw: http://tinyurl.com/6yrkbj8 Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:15 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Libel Cases The Court of Appeal for Ontario has released Paulsson v.... [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:40 am by Walter Olson
[Trevor Burrus, HuffPo] Tags: Alex Kozinski, bullying, campaign regulation, emergency medicine, libel slander and defamation, mass tort fraud, nursing homes, NYC, sports, sued if you do, Texas, Twitter, workers' compensation Related posts March 31 roundup (3) Web 2.0 beware: Fair Housing Counsel of San Fernando Valley v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:08 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Levy, 417 U.S. 733 (1974), Gregor at 8, is similarly fanciful. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:23 pm
  For current purposes, it only means that a debate over container detention charges (and associated enforcement action) arising out of charges levied pursuant to a maritime bill of lading will need to be litigated in a Court or Tribunal which is vested with appropriate jurisdiction to resolve "maritime" claims. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:53 am by Greg Akselband
Previously relying on the requirement that a mark be “identical or nearly identical” to the plaintiff’s famous mark for dilution to exist, the 9th Circuit in Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:09 pm by Michael McCann
Their core argument is that the NFL lockout and various NFL restrictions on trade, including the draft, are illegal under federal antitrust law -- an argument also made in Brady v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
 There's also a neat Current Intelligence note by the perceptive Enrico Bonadio (City Law School, London) on the Advocate General's Opinion on what counts as "communication to the public" in the joined cases of Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure, YouTube and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08), which the Court of Justice is going to decide this summer. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:49 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Harrison, R (on the application of) v Birmingham Magistrate’s Court & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 332 (25 March 2011) Secretary of State for the Home Department v MK (Tunisia) [2011] EWCA Civ 333 (25 March 2011) Brook v Reed [2011] EWCA Civ 331 (25 March 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Bowker & Anor (t/a Lagopus Services) v The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds [2011] EWHC 737 (QB) (25 March 2011) … [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 5:35 pm by Donna
“Bet the Farm” versus “Law Factory”: Which One Works – Ron Friedman and Toby Brown Law Firm Investment Portfolios – V. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:54 am by Jordan Furlong
Law Firm Investment Portfolios built on Ron and Toby’s work, a post by V. [read post]