Search for: "LaBelle v. LaBelle" Results 2441 - 2460 of 12,167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Specifically, the product was considered misbranded for declaring on its label that it contains "No Formaldehyde and is "Formaldehyde Free. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 3:22 am
The RIAA has moved to dismiss counterclaims which have been interposed in a Columbus, Georgia, case, Priority v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 11:48 am
Judge McMahon has denied the RIAA's motion to dismiss its case against Patti Santangelo without prejudice in Elektra v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:50 am
523/10 Wintersteiger AG v Products 4U Sondermaschinenbau GmbH was a major intellectual property dispute on which the Court of Justice of the European Union was asked for guidance by the Oberster Gerichtshof, Austria, you might have thought it was about something quite different altogether: the court's Curia calendar curiously labelled it a ruling on "Freedom, Security and Justice". [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:37 am by Pascale Lorber
Pascale LorberThe United Kingdom Supreme court confirmed on 13 June 2018 in the case of Pimlico v Smith what another three lower courts had already decided in the same case: that attempts by employers to label workers as self-employed under elaborate contractual arrangements can be unravelled by the judiciary to benefit the individuals. [read post]