Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 11,296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2010, 5:18 am
;United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:13 pm
Concluding that the class claims were not barred as a matter of law, the Bridgeford court relied substantially on the United States Supreme Court decision in Smith v. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
United States, 364 U.S. 40 (1960) While the consent of individual officials representing the United States cannot "estop" the United States, it can lead to the fruition of a number of expectancies embodied in the concept of "property" expectancies that, if sufficiently important, the Government must condemn and pay for before it takes over the management of the landowner's property. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 9:38 am
Krull , 480 U.S. 340 (1987) (police conducted a search in reasonable reliance on subsequently invalidated state statutes); Arizona v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:27 am
Nelson By: Jillian Kornblatt On January 19, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of NASA v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:02 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Arizona v Gant, 556 U.S. ___, 129 S Ct 1710, 173 L Ed 2d 485 (2009), which abrogated the well-established rule in New York v Belton, 453 U.S. 454; 101 S Ct 2860; 69 L Ed 2d 768 (1981) and its progeny, we must consider whether an officer's good faith reliance on case law that is later overturned may form a proper basis to avoid the operation of the exclusionary rule. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 5:15 am
But is Google facilitating that trend on behalf of law enforcement more rapidly in the United States than elsewhere across the globe? [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 1:25 pm
, United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 5:51 am
United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932), which is codified at section 775.021(4)(a) of the Florida Statutes, requires that each charged offense include an element the other does not.FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ V. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
" McRo, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:41 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 11:34 am
On August 10, 2018, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Camden Vicinage) held that under New Jersey law, private employers are not required to waive drug tests for users of medical marijuana. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:43 pm
United States V. [read post]
Tribal Court Dismisses Trespass Charges Against Members Holding Religious Ceremony To Block Pipeline
8 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
" Here defendants had the right to hold religious ceremonies (with invited guests) on land ceded to the United States. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 12:21 pm
Patents The Kluwer Patent Blog focuses on the Unitary Patent system, considering that Brexit should not result in delays to German ratification of the Unitary Patent Court Agreement, as well as examining the progress of other Unitary Patent Court Member States in its pursuit of ratification.The IPWatchdog provides an overview of the drone delivery technology patent battle between Amazon and Walmart, who from June 2018 to June 2019 have filed 54 and 97 drone… [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:04 pm
United States (No. 09-10245), the question was whether a defendant who pled guilty to a crack offense pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(C) could obtain a sentence modification in light of the 2007 amendment to the crack sentencing guidelines. [read post]
