Search for: "MAY v. US "
Results 2441 - 2460
of 120,426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 10:46 am
” A recent case in point is Florida Agency for Health Care Administration v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 10:02 am
In Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 7:03 pm
Bill Patry discussed Mannion v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:46 am
The post State v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 9:07 am
In Sanchez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 2:44 am
Moreover, state interests in land use regulation may also be implicated in that case. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 4:59 pm
Moreover, state interests in land use regulation may also be implicated in that case. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:54 am
Payne v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 12:24 pm
An excerpt: In Ogilvie v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 12:53 pm
In Hauseur v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 11:00 am
In Meriwether v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 5:33 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:41 am
The Court noted Town Law requires, in order to be eligible for a use variance, the applicant must demonstrate that it may not obtain a reasonable return from any use of the property permitted under the applicable zoning code. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:13 am
Continue Reading › The post Medicaid Asset Protection Trust (MAPT) v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 11:30 am
Choudhry * Republishing Entire Newspaper Story is Fair Use--Righthaven v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 6:56 am
However, a recent decision from the 9th Circuit reminds us that it may not matter whether a federal law specifically creates a PRA. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Any party may serve and file a reply to such a brief on or before March 19, 2014. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:03 am
Two recent decisions illustrate when an applicant may, and when it may not, successfully move to amend its opposed, geographically unrestricted application to one for concurrent use registration. [read post]