Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 19,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2019, 4:15 am
District Court for the Central District of California recently issued a decision in the closely watched Patagonia, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Freedom From Religion Foundation v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
This decision marks the latest action in the ongoing efforts by EPA and states to regulate greenhouse gas emissions; particularly in terms of carbon emissions from currently existing power plants. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:33 am
Kirkpatrick v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:00 am
# # #DECISIONMatter of CADG v Ryba [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:09 am
VIP PRODUCTS LLC (Opinion, United States Supreme Court) Agencies issue fina... [read post]
30 May 2013, 7:42 am
(ADIR International, LLC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:30 am
United States). [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:57 am
Guarascio v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:07 pm
December 1, 2020 marked the five-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s abrogation of Form 18—the model complaint that provided the minimum requirements for stating a claim of direct infringement. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:57 am
United States, 536 U.S. 1014 (2002). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:34 am
"Mudge v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 4:06 pm
King v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:44 am
Fla. 1990), aff'g General Rent-A-Car Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
There was still no infringement or passing off so far as SCRABBLE v SCRAMBLE was concerned, however. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 9:38 am
& A. 1907); State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
But how about trade marks, wonders Eleonora? [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:32 am
In AJ v JJ & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 1448 the court was required to deal with the situation where the children wished to have their views heard in an abduction case.Lord Justice ThorpeThe Facts: As Lord Justice Thorpe said giving the leading judgment, on the face of it this was a paradigm case for a return order. [read post]
