Search for: "Matter of M C B"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 3,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2012, 5:52 am
Lawyers A, B & C each keep their active files in their own filing cabinets. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:26 am
I’m not sure what day – but it is likely to be Fridays. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Knowing this, read Sub-paragraph B again. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
This year, I’m taking a look at the history of Super Bowl logos. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:36 am
On or about March 31, 2011, a transfer of approximately $1,060,274; c. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am
C. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:07 pm
§ 75-1.1; and [c] the Internet and electronic commerce. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:17 am
Yet, in support of the FCC’s attempt to avoid a vagueness attack through its generic “context matters” approach to defining indecency – an indefensibly inconsistent approach that Justice Kagan justly summarized as, “nobody can use dirty words or nudity except for Steven Spielberg” – the chief justice made a telling slip of pronoun: “All we [sic] are asking for, what the government is asking for, is a few channels where you can say… [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:10 am
The full text of the Court’s merits ruling on this last point is reprinted below: C. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
., Appellee. 2nd District.Child support -- Child custody -- Intervention -- Where Department of Revenue initiated proceedings to establish paternity and require father to pay medical support and child support; father filed petition seeking custody of child and child support from child's mother; custody petition was transferred to a new lower court case number; mother and father ultimately entered into agreement providing that father would consent to termination of parental rights and mother… [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:53 am
This decision is not publicly available but, as always, I’m happy to provide a copy to anyone who contacts me and requests one. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
SOPA and Censorship Spillovers — Law professor Randal C. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 2:46 am
But then they switch to the active voice: “We respond expeditiously”—a phrase directly from the safe harbor provisions of the Copyright Act (especially 512(c)(1)(A)(iii) and 512(c)(1)(C) for those who are reading along)—“to requests [i.e., DMCA notices] to remove such content from our services” and “have been improving our procedures over time” the most prominent of which is ContentID on YouTube that figures large… [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:58 am
§ 9.10(3)(b). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:37 am
B. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:09 am
And given the court’s ruling, I’m guessing that the third trial will involve cross-examination of her regarding other sexual crimes against her. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:41 pm
When I clerked for Judge Sam B. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:27 am
According to the prosecution’s brief on appeal, unauthorized use of a movable has four distinct elements: (A) the intentional taking or use of a movable (B) which belongs to another (C) either without the other's consent or by means of fraudulent conduct practices or representations, but (D) without any intention to deprive the other of the movable permanently. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 3:16 am
The idea would be only pre-cleared commenters would be able to comment, sort of similar to the way facebook allows you to comment on things without intermediation, but only b/c the poster knows who's commenting. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:16 am
But the devil is in the detail… Under the relevant rules, the loading density for pigs of around 100 kg should not exceed 235 kg/m². [read post]
