Search for: "People v Challenger"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 18,773
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2016, 9:01 pm
House of Representatives v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm
People v Scott, Michigan Dept of State Police v Sitz, Indianapolis v Edmond, People v Jackson and People v Trotter settled that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:49 pm
It appears that the curious case of Gallop v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:17 am
Oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 3:59 am
On Monday, the court issued an opinion in Beckles v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 4:47 pm
Included in this group are cases in which the Fourth Department had affirmed the conviction despite a challenge to the voluntariness of the confession (See, e.g., People v Warney, 299 AD2d 956, 957, lv denied 99 NY2d 633 in which a man was wrongfully convicted and incarcerated for 10 years on the basis of a false confession (See). [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
., v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 5:40 am
It is now so commonplace in challenges to agency actions that I have heard several people quip that it would be malpractice for an attorney not to invoke the doctrine when challenging any agency action. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 4:09 am
At Reuters, Lawrence Hurley reports that during Wednesday’s argument in Maslenjak v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 6:59 am
Cohen v. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 11:40 am
Also his challenge was vague and conclusory.In Gresham v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 8:07 am
"] From Judge Gary Sharpe's opinion today in Soos v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 8:10 am
"It would shut the door on that issue, which many people thought had been shut in Coker v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 4:06 pm
On April 25, when the Supreme Court hears argument in Hawaii v Trump, the challenge to President Trump’s third executive order imposing a travel ban on nationals from eight countries (“EO-3”), the Court will have received the views not only of the parties but of numerous other interested individuals, organizations, and states who have submitted 73 amicus briefs. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 7:47 am
This description should be enough to resolve this case” (State of Texas v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 8:05 pm
A divided California Supreme Court ruled that a Fourth Amendment violation resulting from an illegal traffic stop may be challenged only by the driver, not any passenger, since the passenger has not been 'seized.'" The California Supreme Court decision is People v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 1:35 pm
After the United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In FDA v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 4:06 pm
D.T.O. v State At the child welfare hearing in his case, D.T.O. moved to exclude evidence seized pursuant to a warrant, objected to an expert testifying without proper notice being given and challenged the chain of custody of a thumb drive. [read post]
