Search for: "People v High"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 15,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
R(Ahmad) v LB Newham [2009] UKHL 14 is now available and the Lords have done a pretty good job at destroying the jurisprudence built up by the High Court and Court of Appeal in Part 6 cases. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
Wolf were correct, then, as we continued extremely high incarceration rates over, say, the last 15 years, crime would have increased (probably substantially, given the record-level prison population), not decreased. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:59 am
The two girls have had no other interaction with each other until this incident. . . .Two years later, J.K. and S.G. were in the same class as sophomores in high school. . . . [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:09 am
As I think is often the case (witness the Boies/Olsen Perry v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:25 am
Hodges and Loving v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 7:31 pm
Sandwiched between high profile decisions on gay marriage and Obamacare in late June, in the case of Reed v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
(People v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:13 am
Lasse Søndergaard Christensen and Kathrine Spinner MadsenIn a recent decision from 1 October 2018 (B-2740-17) the Danish Eastern High Court affirmed a decision of the Danish Commercial Court from December 2017 (V-8-17) in which the court had ruled that a café in Copenhagen had infringed the trademark rights and copyrights to the character Obelix which rightfully belongs to Les Editions Albert René S.A.R.L (Albert René). [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 1:44 pm
The interviewing manager gave her high marks and recommended she be hired. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
In Alexander v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm
DFT v TFD [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB) (27 September 2010) – Read the judgment Updated | In a recent restraint of publication case, the High Court has assessed the conflicting requirements of open justice and freedom of speech versus the privacy interests of the applicant. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
The judge at first instance granted the order, but it was quashed by the High Court on an application for judicial review on the grounds that the procedure adopted was unfair to the respondent. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
The judge at first instance granted the order, but it was quashed by the High Court on an application for judicial review on the grounds that the procedure adopted was unfair to the respondent. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am
In a YouTube video, Philip DeFranco takes a high-octane look at the issues in Carpenter v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:27 pm
Politicians are elected by people; they have a right to know the financial antecedents. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 8:38 pm
As many people do, he may have kept his financial affairs to himself. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 2:01 am
Harris and his assignees.One has an "employer looking at employee email" issue:The controlling case in California is People v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:16 am
”(per Mr Justice Fulford, Southard v DPP [2006] EWHC 3449). [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
[Mask mandates, high-capacity magazines, and debauchery.] [read post]
