Search for: "People v Word" Results 2441 - 2460 of 17,907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
  * It could only happen in America: PETA litigates over macaque selfieOne of those stories that lead people to hate animals. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:35 am
His conclusion: “Both words can function as nouns, but female, unlike woman, can also be an adjective. [read post]
10 May 2009, 2:58 pm
  This suggestion was made in the context of a public figure in the Mosley v News Group case (UK, 2008) that I blogged about over at The Faculty Lounge recently. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 2:21 pm by John S. Merculief II
But the thing is, for many people, “I saw it on the internet, so it must be true” is not a sarcastic expression, but rather words to live by. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 9:03 am
The case is Mann v. the Georgia Department of Corrections.In a strongly-worded, unanimous opinion, the Court held that Ga. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It doesn’t make the stop unlawful if there is a subsidiary purpose – “killing two birds with one stone” – but the permitted purpose must be the “true and dominant purpose behind the act” (R v Southwark Crown Court ex p. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 10:16 am by Patrick Bracher
The SABC tried the academic argument in SABC v Masstores to get R7.5 million penalties out of Masstores and rightly failed. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 8:30 am by azatty
A recent post of his reminded me that the use of the word “green” may be getting a bit green around the gills. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 8:38 am by Race to the Bottom
Even the Chamber of Digital Commerce notes in its amicus brief for SEC v. [read post]