Search for: "Petition of United States" Results 2441 - 2460 of 23,961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2011, 10:03 am
Late last week the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services released the most recent count for its H-1B visas. [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:08 am by Sam Favate
Late last year, the Montana Supreme Court ruled that a state law banning corporate political spending could stand, even in the face of the 2010 Citizens United decision. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 10:21 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
"If they decide to hear our case, then the issue will be front and center before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 10:52 am by BTugendstein
On November 24, 2018, the Ninth Circuit denied the Stephens Institute’s petition for rehearing en banc in United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 9:52 am
Adolph was returned to the United States yesterday and concludes:While Mr. [read post]
25 May 2007, 11:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:47 am
This week the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it had reached the cap for H-1B petitions in FY 2013. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:08 am by Adams Lee
Department of Commerce (DOC) to make a determination that the named subject imports from Mexico and China are being sold to the United States at less than fair value (“dumping”). [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:47 pm
On May 7, 2013, the United States Tax Court issued an opinion that can be used as a reminder for a tax lawyer or other professional in John C. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:11 pm
United States, No. 05-5713-pr (2d Cir. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:57 am
  Adopting and bringing a foreign-born orphan into the United States is a complex legal process. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:41 am by Dwight Sullivan
  The deadline for either a cert petition or request for additional time to file a cert petition in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:20 pm by Mark Keenan
   More importantly (and more troubling), however, the Board’s decision unambiguously states that when a group of employees or union petitions for an “identifiable” group of employees, that unit should be an appropriate unit unless the employer (or another interested party like another union) demonstrates that excluded employees in a larger unit share “an overwhelming community of interest with those in a… [read post]