Search for: "President v. State" Results 2441 - 2460 of 22,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2016, 5:38 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Scalia's majority opinion was very useful in the ultimate habeas corpus petition filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.Another example of Scalia's handiwork in the realm of the constitutional rights of the accused is his dissent in the 2000 case of Apprendi v New Jersey, which ripened into a majority opinion 4-years later in Blakely v Washington, holding that a judge cannot fashion a sentence based on facts that were not… [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  As we discuss further in Section IV, SB 264 is also the subject of  a constitutional and statutory challenge in the federal courts in the case of Shen v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 2:37 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The court explained that these judges are principal officers under the constitution and thus, must be appointed by the President of the United States rather than merely the Head of Department. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:03 pm by Larry
United States (President Bident and a bunch of other named officials are also defendants).The gist of the decision is simple enough. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
David SchwartzNext week, in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:10 am by Marissa Miller
This weekend’s coverage focused on the President’s comments on the Court and the Affordable Care Act, the fallout from those comments, and last week’s opinion in Florence v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 5:14 pm by INFORRM
On 12 October 2010 the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights, presided over by English judge Sir Nicholas Bratza, gave judgment in the Article 10 case of Saaristo v Finland. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:59 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm by Cary Coglianese
They possess a “unique responsibility” to pursue justice, as the Supreme Court stated in the 1987 case of Young v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:19 am by Chijioke Okorie
For instance, a group of South African Copyright Academics issued a Joint Academic Opinion stating that there was no constitutional need/requirement to re-tag the Bills. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate on August 2, 1979. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
Hawaii, the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to uphold President Donald Trump’s order restricting entry into the United States by nationals of seven countries, most of which have majority-Muslim populations. [read post]