Search for: "Russell v State"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 2,847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 7:18 pm
The United States Supreme Court has this paradigm case pending before it (Morrison v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:56 pm
Most of Russell’s paper concentrates on Simkins’ career at UT, as well as the 1954 decision (five weeks after Brown v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 10:19 am
In the immediate years after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am
(all) Amicus brief of the Cato Institute et al. (09-988) Amicus brief of eight states (09-991) Title: PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:07 pm
Check the Abbott v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am
Florida, United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:45 pm
This paper seeks to investigate this domain, having regard to the interests of user, relatives, platform and especially, the public interest in preservation of online cultural heritage.16 June, OECD Workshop on Internet intermediaries, Paris; closed meeting. 17 -18 June, CCD COE Conference on Cyber Conflict 2010, Tallinn, Estonia (speaking on state attribution and domestic legsl remedies for preventing cyberattacks, with Russell Buchan , Sheffield University) 28-29 June GikII… [read post]
14 May 2010, 3:15 am
Supreme Court Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd, R (on the application of)v Wolverhampton City Council & Anor [2010] UKSC 20 (12 May 2010) ZN (Afghanistan) & Ors v Entry Clearance Officer (Karachi) [2010] UKSC 21 (12 May 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust v Roldan [2010] EWCA Civ 522 (13 May 2010) Moulton v Chief Constable of the West Midlands [2010] EWCA Civ 524 (13 May 2010) De Bruyne v De Bruyne & Ors… [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:02 pm
Opinion below (5th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s supplemental brief Case involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Title: SKF USA, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:14 am
" Russell also cites caselaw from the Second Circuit where the court has held that certain enhancements did not apply.We have often discussed the importance of challenging prior convictions in state court, but it is even more important in federal court - the prior conviction could mean a life sentence for the client. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
In addition, the authority of local and state regulatory agencies will be usurped by the U.S. [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:25 pm
Matter of Russell Oaks, Inc. v Planning Bd. of Inc. [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:25 pm
Matter of Russell Oaks, Inc. v Planning Bd. of Inc. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:23 pm
In the immediate years after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:25 pm
See Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 6:20 am
United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 9:12 am
Finally, at Slate, Rick Hasen comments on last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:30 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:03 pm
In Jerman v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
Louis Dispatch, and the Columbia (MO) Daily Tribune all report on a case that has been dropped as a result of last week’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
