Search for: "Scott T. Marks" Results 2441 - 2460 of 2,524
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2007, 7:18 am
  Mark Bennett at Defending People has started a series answering them (the first post is a reading list), and Jon Katz at Underdog Blog has his answers here. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 8:37 am
" They're hoping you won't notice that. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 10:57 pm
Tuesday, July 24, 2007, marks this blog's first year anniversary. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 10:01 pm
  If not, you needn't bother. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:56 am
“It’s one of the most important developments in technology in the courtroom in the last five years,” said Mark J. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 11:08 pm
 Next Simple Justice responds, and then Mark Bennett. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 6:33 am
Is Mark Bennett "the best new legal blogger of 2007"? [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 4:00 am
Scott Henson (Grits For Breakfast) has written extensively about snitching; he steered me toward his posts on the subject in his comments to my post on the Abandonment of American Ideals. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 8:18 am
" To make sure he wasn't reading the situation wrong, Parsons sought a second opinion from Scott Baugh, the head of the Orange County Republican Party and the former Huntington Beach assemblyman who wrote the compensation law that Davis signed. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 11:29 pm
Mark's Episcopal Church. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 7:17 am
"  Mark Bennett at Defending People had an extended analysis yesterday, and Scott Greenfield at Simple Justice added his thoughts today. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 5:00 am
That doesn't mean any less (or less frequent) gratitude! [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 5:56 am
As noted here earlier this season, some folks who cover the club on a regular basis don't even know the answer to that question. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:57 am
There's no evidence about what Mark Kipnis did or didn't know. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 2:26 pm
The Carmel decision marked the first time the state's highest court has ruled on current annexation law. [read post]