Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 4,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2017, 7:30 am
However, the court then took a sharp turn away from Katyal’s position. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Mercks clash over law governing coexistence dealThe Merck v Merck trade mark dispute (real name: Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others) has already appeared a couple of times on this weblog [see here and here], with the further honour to have a dedicated poll on who between the Germans and the Americans should have right to use that much-contended name. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm
On 28 March 2017, Popplewell J handed down judgment in Brevan Howard Asset Management v Reuters [2017] EWHC 644 (QB). [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
On 22 and 23 July 2019 the same judge heard the trial in the case of Fentiman v Marsh. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am
In the case of Versi v express.co.uk IPSO found that there had been no code breach. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 5:25 pm
That conclusion appears to rest mainly on one precedent: the Supreme Court’s decision in Powell v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in on this again in R. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 11:07 am
The enquiries required to be made were those that were necessary fairly to make a decision as to the suitability of the property, Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire District Council (2005) EWCA Civ 925. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
In the Proposition 8 case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm
The Case of Alpha Doryforiki v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:40 am
” I was pleased to see the Justices asking some sharp questions about the interpretation of that term for regulatory purposes. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:31 am
General EU – India agreement in WTO dispute raises bar for EU drug seizures (IP Watch) EU: CJEU rules on repackaging of pharma goods: Joined Cases C-400/09 and C-207/10 Orifarm and Paranova v Merck Sharp Dohme (Class 46) (IPKat) EU: Ophtal v Oftal Cusi- General Court upholds finding of no likelihood of confusion for identical goods in T-160/09 (Class 46) EU: The holiday is over: a close reading of the opinion in Medeva: Joined Cases C? [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 5:42 am
For an interesting recent case dealing with this question, see AFDI v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:07 pm
As already mentioned, on 6 May 2021 Julian Knowles J handed down judgment in Spicer v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 27 and 28 and 30 November 2018 Nicklin J heard the privacy trial in ZXC v Bloomberg. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 12:35 pm
State v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 11:00 pm
The Dusseldorf Regional Court put that Huawei v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:02 am
Sullivan, Gertz v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
How does all this relate to Koppelman’s argument in Gay Rights v. [read post]
