Search for: "State v Edge" Results 2441 - 2460 of 2,593
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 6:11 pm
Below, Karen Williams previews next term’s Bell v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 1:09 am
Sherman in his Texas State & Local Tax Law BlogAlso worth noting: Fox Rothschild attorney Francis G.X. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:59 am
  It just may be, if David Kopel at VC is correct when he writes: District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 1:37 pm
The Court of Appeals decision yesterday (Thursday) in the case of Board of Commissioners of LaPorte County, Board of Commissioners of Porter County, Town of Beverly Shores, et al v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:18 am
The panel also ruled that an improper motive for a challenge by one attorney out of several in a multi-defendant case can be enough to violate the principle of Batson v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 9:50 pm
The Court then stated what it said was the ruling of most federal courts on the subject of general objections:'objections stated at the beginning of the response to the interrogatories, are ineffective and are an abuse of the discovery process because such objections block discovery without explaining why and to what extent.' Waters Edge Living, LLC v. [read post]