Search for: "State v. Argus "
Results 2441 - 2460
of 85,034
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 3:56 am
On Wednesday, in State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am
We argue that state election officials, courts, and presidential electors all have the responsibility to faithfully apply Section Three's constitutional disqualification rule, each within the sphere of its respective powers and duties under state or federal law. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
See State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm
KRISTINA PASCARELLA AND ANNA D’ ANTONIO, Petitioner,v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm
Taamneh and Gonzalez v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
The case is the most significant elections matter the justices have been forced to confront since the Bush v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:25 pm
Pearson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:45 pm
In this response Essay, I argue: first, that Lepore's marginalization of Article V's convention mechanism is in tension with her own historical and normative account; second, that while Lepore's wariness of conventions is entirely understandable given the state of our politics—and entirely commonplace among progressives—it carries significant risks of its own; and third, that constitutional conventions are not as unfamiliar as they might seem and… [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:44 pm
In this response Essay, I argue: first, that Lepore's marginalization of Article V's convention mechanism is in tension with her own historical and normative account; second, that while Lepore's wariness of conventions is entirely understandable given the state of our politics—and entirely commonplace among progressives—it carries significant risks of its own; and third, that constitutional conventions are not as unfamiliar as they might seem and… [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 10:14 am
Della v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:54 am
The case of Ellison v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:54 am
The case of Ellison v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
Critics have noted that the proponents of this theory argue that the Speaker and Senate President Pro Tempore are “Officers of the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
While Davis was on the SJC, the court issued advisory opinions on two of the most explosive issues in American politics: Black voting rights after Dred Scott v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
” Observing that merger applications “exist along a spectrum” where “some have significant deficiencies” and others are “straightforward because the acquiring bank is a model of safety and soundness and has earned the trust of the community and its supervisors,” Acting Comptroller Hsu argued that the “majority lie somewhere in between and require varying degrees of scrutiny and multiple rounds of inquiry,” and said the policy statement… [read post]
