Search for: "State v. Branch" Results 2441 - 2460 of 6,971
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2011, 7:36 am by Big Tent Democrat
Stated objectively, it means the judiciary overturning actions of the other two branches. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:24 am
Justice Alito writes for the majority plurality in Hein v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  Article V not only imposes supermajority requirements but imposes them at two levels – Congress and state legislatures (or conventions) – both of which must be satisfied. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:51 am by Nicholas Bronni
Nicholas Bronni serves as the solicitor general for the state of Arkansas, which co-authored an amicus brief joined by 14 other states supporting the government in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:52 pm by Don Cruse
This could spell some trouble for the taxpayers in Nestle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:52 pm by Don Cruse
This could spell some trouble for the taxpayers in Nestle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 1:19 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  Every judge in the state has to be wondering, ”Will I be subjected to the same attacks, simply if I get assigned a case that requires the two political branches to comply with the rule of law ? [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 10:53 am by Kevin
  Here's the first sentence from Dockery v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:06 pm by Wells Bennett
The government has filed its opposition brief in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:07 am
  One Texas case on that issue was denied review in October; a new case from that state, Oliver v. [read post]