Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 22,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2007, 5:57 am
See, e.g., Ormandy v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:20 am
While we know from Reno v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 9:46 am
Evers (Indian Taxation; Treaty Rights) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlHarris v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
This was the issue in Burgueno v. [read post]
31 Jan 2006, 4:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
If the employer articulates such a reason, the burden shifts back to the plaintiff to show at the third step either that “the employer’s stated justification for its adverse action was nothing but a pretext for discrimination,” or that, “even if the employer had mixed motives, the plaintiff’s membership in a protected class was at least one motivating factor in the employer’s adverse action. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
If the employer articulates such a reason, the burden shifts back to the plaintiff to show at the third step either that “the employer’s stated justification for its adverse action was nothing but a pretext for discrimination,” or that, “even if the employer had mixed motives, the plaintiff’s membership in a protected class was at least one motivating factor in the employer’s adverse action. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:00 am
In Hughes v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 10:28 am
In Lummis v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:38 am
Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) from putting its new claims and continuation rules into effect (SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
It is the job of the defense to increase the State's burden through legal measures. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 8:34 am
See Snyder v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 1:36 pm
Today, design patent law is in the weakest and most confused state since before the Supreme Court’s landmark 1871 decision of Gorham v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:12 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 7:10 am
In Gover v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:00 pm
I’m worried about the future of Roe v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Sources: State statutes; state revenue departments; Tax Foundation research. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 12:45 pm
In State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:19 am
Compare Brown v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 5:03 pm
Hence, the government has the burden of demonstrating that a regulation of speech is constitutionally permissible (see U.S. v. [read post]
