Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2008, 12:16 am
This seems like an eminently reasonable argument to me, but the court of appeal holds that statutory immunity shields the state even from affirmative defenses based on government conduct that would be immune to suit. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:34 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
Equally fortunately, I can confidently state that none of the programs we will be discussing today were within my purview when I was at the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm
In its statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant maintained the main request and auxiliary requests 1 to 5 considered in the contested decision and resubmitted those requests as main request and auxiliary requests I to V. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:03 am
I’m waiting for the day I see something like that in a state court opinion. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:48 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:48 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 12:03 pm
Burke v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm
California’s appellate courts and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals have long held that such waivers are unenforceable under California state law (the Iskanian Rule). [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:28 pm
So I’m challenging myself to find something interesting about the 23-page June 26, 2012, decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit—as I write about it. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:37 am
In State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:09 pm
So I’m challenging myself to find something interesting about the 23-page June 26, 2012, decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit—as I write about it. [read post]
4 May 2011, 10:18 am
The Supreme Court in Surya Dev Rai v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 3:47 am
My wait wasn’t nearly as long as I expected. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 6:28 am
I warmly recommend filing cases with the Munich I Regional Court, where Presiding Judge Tobias Pichlmaier of the antitrust-specialized 37th Civil Chamber (the division to which I would expect DMA complaints to be assigned) has demonstrated in his years on the bench of the court's patent-specialized division his analytical skills in a technological context. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
… FamilyLLBAppeal Court Confirms Unique “Philosophy” of the Ontario Family Law Rules The Ontario Court of Appeal, in a recent case called Frick v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 6:54 pm
The Hawaii Supreme Court issued an opinion in Omerod v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 4:26 pm
Bottini, Jr. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 12:17 am
S and A, [2008] EWCA Crim. 2177 (Court of Appeal - Criminal Division 2008). [read post]
