Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 7,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
Earlier this year, the Fourth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:17 am
Perry (involving Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:30 pm
The commentary to this rule states that “[a]ny intentional disclosure by the holder of the privilege defeats this purpose and eliminates the necessity for the privilege in that instance. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
[All of the facts in this post come from the 11th Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 9:54 am
Rogers v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 12:08 pm
§ 109(a) entitles owners of copyrighted articles to take certain acts “without the authority” of the copyright holder. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:52 am
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:15 am
See Wilson v United States, 221 US 361 (1911). [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 1:33 am
The EU should do something about Turner v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 7:08 am
Let's face it, we'd much rather get the stuff we want rather than those ugly sweaters and hideous candlestick holders. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:00 pm
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 12:14 pm
Amgen v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:13 am
Cooper, 99 N.J. 42 (1984) and Holder v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:37 am
Holder, an immigration case in which the Court will hear oral argument later this month. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Ninth Circuit Sends the Hawaii Concealed Carry Challenge Back Down to District Court
19 Aug 2022, 1:30 pm
The Supreme Court has vacated the judgment of this Court and remanded this case to us "for further consideration in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
The purpose of the 2006 Act was specifically stated to lessen the “undue burden” trademark holders have with dilution claims. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 7:30 pm
More importantly, the court established the royalty rate and gave relevant guidelines that both SEPs holders and implementers should comply with when it comes to negotiating licenses in China. [read post]
26 May 2023, 7:26 am
Last year, former GuestKat Jan Jacobi reported both the Warsaw District Court’s Referral to the CJEU and AG Rantos’ Opinion on the TB v Castorama Polska and Knor litigation (see IPKat posts here and here). [read post]
