Search for: "State v. Lien"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 2,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
Last month we examined some pre-Roman beginnings of modern admiralty doctrine, starting from pre-history through the Greek city states. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:35 am
Remember Rudovsky v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 7:22 pm
§ 71.93(8)(b), which requires state agencies to enter into an agreement with the Department of Revenue for collecting long-term debts. [read post]
22 May 2020, 5:12 pm
Weglarz v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
If you’re interested, see chapter 10 (“Governing Cyberspace II: Names”) of my book In Search of Jefferson’s Moose: Notes on the State of Cyberspace for a detailed account. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
V. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 2:59 pm
The Main Street borrower must have “significant” operations in the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 8:26 am
One has seen how that is now being developed using the mechanisms of private law in OECD Specific Instance applications against enterprises ealleged to have breached their responsibility (markets driven private law based) and to that extent extra legal as a function of domestic legal orders) through acts of complicity in fragile states, conflict zones, or in cooperating with states whose own views of human rights ans sustainability are incompatible with those of the home… [read post]
21 Feb 2006, 11:47 am
Following U.S. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 11:21 am
In a recent speech to a joint session of Congress given in February, President Obama stated that “[he] believe[s] the nation that invented the automobile cannot walk away from it. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 9:59 am
Two key elements in MassHealth planning are that the property not be reachable by a creditor (such as the state MassHealth program), either (1) during the client’s lifetime or (2) after the client’s death. [read post]
23 May 2021, 2:04 pm
” Sandberg v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:07 pm
Since section 112 only addresses the termination of service contracts, this amendment really isn't absolutely necessary, and this is especially so in light of Justice Paul Perel's decision in the case of PSCC No. 668 v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:17 pm
(Art Lien) First, a bit of background. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 11:50 am
Take, for example, the chestnut case of Batsakis v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:20 pm
In a recent 5-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:00 pm
There are 26 federative states (and the federal district) in Brazil, each of which have the powers to adopt their own Constitutions and laws, subject to the rules and principles provided for under the Federal Constitution. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 6:42 pm
By making consigned work trust property and any sales proceeds trust funds, these are considered to be held in statutory trust, and thus cannot become property of the gallery nor subjected or subordinated to any claims, liens or security interests of gallery creditors.[40] To better protect artists’ interests, a consignment agreement should make clear that ownership of the works remains with the artist for the duration of the consignment period, and that title shall only pass when the… [read post]
