Search for: "State v. Light" Results 2441 - 2460 of 29,345
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
Surveillance Privacy advocates are worried about the use of surveillance technology to track women seeking abortions in US states that have banned and restricted the procedure following the Supreme Court decision which overturned Roe v Wade. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 11:10 am by Guest Author
Download this Insight (PDF) Access the code and data (GitHub repository) Introduction The majority decision in Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 2:57 pm by William Appleton
  Peter Marguiles analyzed the Fifth Circuit’s Oct. 5 ruling in Texas v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:53 pm by Kalvis Golde
The justices granted the states’ petition in Arizona v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am by INFORRM
Insofar as Mostyn J had previously determined otherwise in cases such as DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam); [2016] 1 WLR 1259 and Appleton v Gallagher, he was wrong: Gallagher at [33]-[34]. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:09 am by Bill Marler
In the 1970s, identification of the virus, and development of serologic tests helped differentiate hepatitis A from other types of non-B hepatitis.[5] Until 2004, HAV was the most frequently reported type of hepatitis in the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 11:04 am by Lawrence Taylor
The publication used a car fitted with a windshield light to simulate a car’s brake lights. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 6:21 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Romola Adeola, Bridging the Accountability Gap in the Protection of Internally Displaced Persons: Non-State Actors Under the Kampala ConventionMariana Clara de Andrade, General Principles of Procedural Law in the Practice of the WTO Appellate Body Marco Longobardo, The Standing of Indirectly Injured States in the Litigation of Community Interests before the ICJ: Lessons Learned and Future Implications in Light of The Gambia v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 12:51 am by Florian Mueller
There are three paragraphs that stress the "central objective of CADE's efforts" ("o objetivo central da atuação do Cade"), which is that of every competition authority in the civilized world: to protect, in the interest of consumer welfare, the competitive process ("concorrência") (as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit also emphasized in its FTC v. [read post]