Search for: "State v. Phillips"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 2,874
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2016, 2:39 pm
He has long defended the Supreme Court’s notorious decision in Kelo v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:28 am
He successfully argued on behalf of the Sac and Fox Nation in the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:07 pm
Watkins v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:07 pm
Watkins v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
Criminal law In R (on the application of Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice; MacDermott, Re, [2011] UKSC 18, [2011] 3 All ER 261 the court was split 5-4 on the controversial issue of exactly when compensation should be paid to victims of miscarriages of justice. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 6:04 am
Dist. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:51 pm
Phillips v Mulcaire [2012] UKSC 28 (24 May 2012). [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 10:50 am
The order states: The Honorable Carlos F. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 9:03 am
Burke V. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Arp, Note: New Jersey Carpenters vacation fund v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Arp, Note: New Jersey Carpenters vacation fund v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
Resolved complaints include: Mrs Lorna Leckie v The Scottish Sun, Mr Andrew Curtis v The Sun, Dr Kalind Parashar v Daily Mail and Councillor James Moher v Brent & Kilburn Times. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:10 am
Phillips and Nationwide Ins. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 11:18 am
Both McCrury's SSP presentation and the 2011 Hancock v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
Testimony of Phillip C. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 6:35 am
For instance, in Phillips v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 6:35 am
For instance, in Phillips v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 6:23 pm
Dean Ardron of Ursel Phillips Fellows Hopkinson LLP covered the employer right to surveillance. [read post]
