Search for: "State v. Prime"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 3,303
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
The district court in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:41 am
In Nicaragua v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
There’s a fair amount of work to be done, but it’s rather so that we can consider in measured time the very important evidence that we’ve heard from the politicians, and in particular this week to have had the benefit of four Prime Ministers and any number of Secretaries of State puts the onus on getting it right rather high. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
In the US, divided government (different parties control the presidency and Congress) is common, but in the UK, Prime Ministers and their cabinets must have the support of Parliament and usually the PM is the leader of a party with a parliamentary majority. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 10:47 pm
In fact, 35% of those polled stated that the school officials never interfered. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 8:17 am
Wells Bennett linked us to video of yesterday’s oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:27 am
Chapter 7 analyzes Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:13 am
"That's a comment on a NYT advice column titled: "Do I Really Need to State My Pronouns? [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 12:50 am
For example, in Clark v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 12:50 am
For example, in Clark v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
Circuit’s decision in McKeever v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 2:22 am
In addition to setting the standard for equivalence in Dutch law, the decision provides a prime example of judicial dialogue. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
The “public concern” test from employment cases is a poor fit for the reasons stated by the dissent. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:34 am
., Carrillo Huettel, LLP v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:16 pm
” This is hardly the kind of independent advocacy the Supreme Court was referring to in Humanitarian Law Project v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
" With paychecks not going out on time, it's more than remarkable that the FTC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 4:33 am
Daubert v. [read post]
