Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 13,690
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2020, 3:46 am
Two points are worth making here; both are demonstrative of problems which beset the current state of the law. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:30 am
United States (2019). [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm
Another older case found in my year-end roundup.Pilla v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 9:56 am
In Schwab v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 9:34 am
Univ. of Notre Dame du Lac v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 3:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:41 am
Wilson, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:20 am
My wife works the register and my two kids bus and wait tables. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 3:53 am
Clay Mackey v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Aug. 4, 2020): Not a really significant case, but I like it because it involves a strong illustration of the concept of relativity of title—the owner of these works is not Disney, and successfully registered the copyright thereto and asserted an infringement claim against a person who copied these works on Etsy. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm
I promised quite a while ago to say more about Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:28 am
FAR 33.103(d)(2)(v)-(vi). [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:04 am
Buckley v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:57 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 2:10 am
The accused was charged for possession of goods, for the purpose of trade, to which a registered trade mark was falsely applied under section 49(c) of the TMA. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:07 pm
Footballer Lionel Messi Cuccittini is allowed to register his surname as a trademark for a sportswear brand after a nine-year legal battle. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 2:10 pm
The Court of Appeals recent decision in State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:01 pm
(relisted after the Dec. 4 conference) United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:28 am
Footballer Lionel Messi Cuccittini is allowed to register his surname as a trademark for a sportswear brand after a nine-year legal battle. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am
In this sense, the CJEU reasoned that paragraph 1 in that provision must be interpreted as allowing a court of a Member State to apply a convention concluded between a Member State of the EU and a non-member State before 1 January 1958 or, for States acceding to the EU, before the date of their accession, such as the Convention between Switzerland and Germany concerning the Reciprocal Protection of Patents, Designs and Trademarks, signed in Berlin on 13 April… [read post]
