Search for: "State v. Sales" Results 2441 - 2460 of 20,855
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2007, 8:47 am
The court grant international fragrance manufacturer Davidoff & Cie, a Swiss company, preliminary injunctive relief against CVS Corp., the multi-state pharmacy operator, preventing the further sale of parallel market and counterfeit COOL WATER fragrances. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 5:25 am
  But, sure enough, there's actually a decision from our state's highest court, refusing to characterize the sale of outdated merchandise as a "deceptive or misleading" business practice.In Matter of Food Parade, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:31 am by David Smith
UK Housing Alliance v Francis [2010] EWCA Civ 117 This is an appeal from a case in Grimsby County Court which we reported on here. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:31 am by David Smith
UK Housing Alliance v Francis [2010] EWCA Civ 117 This is an appeal from a case in Grimsby County Court which we reported on here. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:11 am by WynnAndWynn
The post ASSET PROTECTION: Homestead v Trust appeared first on Wynn And Wynn. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 3:29 am
Representation and indemnification of public officers and employees sued for acts or omissions related to the performance of official dutiesWalsh v County of Saratoga, 256 AD2d 953 [decided with Mason v County of Saratoga]In this “tax sale” lawsuit, the Saratoga County Treasurer, George Gasser, said that his official position in the matter and that of the Board of Supervisors were incongruous. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 3:40 am by Peter Mahler
”  The decision in Born to Build LLC v. 1141 Realty LLC, 2013 NY Slip Op 02193 (1st Dept Apr. 2, 2013), goes on to state: The affidavits at issue here [submitted by BTB] do little more than assert that the affiants were told by Ibrahim Saleh, a former manager of 1141 Realty, that he was actually an owner, and the petition makes assertions premised only upon information and belief. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Alice Grainger, Levison Meltzer Pigott
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
The second part of the judgment then focused on whether such violation was justified by the unique qualities of the property in question, the peculiarities of its discovery, or the Italian State’s interest in preserving the integrity of its cultural patrimony. [read post]