Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 2441 - 2460 of 20,314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal judgment from Newman v Southampton City Council & Ors [2021] EWCA Civ 437 (25 March 2021) is here. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:58 am
  Tristan Sherliker (Bird & Bird) reports on a recent decision of Mr Justice Birss in Accord Healthcare Ltd v Research Corporation Technologies Inc [2017] EWHC 2711 on the issue. [read post]
5 May 2009, 10:31 am
The Supreme Court in 2005 outlawed the death penalty for juvenile criminals in the case Roper v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am by Eric Goldman
  For nearly 30 years, the framework for judging fair use cases has been remarkably stable, based on Justice Souter’s masterful opinion for a unanimous Court in Campbell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:16 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The five Justices who turned aside a major challenge to Obamacare earlier are still on the Court, but there is no way to be sure they would do so this time, too. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:34 am by SHG
  You may recall that the 8th Circuit held that prolonging a stop for 7-8 minutes was a de minimus delay, while the Supreme Court of Nevada held in State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 2:28 pm
  In a  brief in opposition to the Justice Department request for en banc rehearing in Bismullah v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 1:21 am
It's not often the IPKat doesn't spot an IP case before the European Court of Justice when it's still in the pipeline, but he does sometimes miss them when the Curia website classifies them under "Commercial Policy" rather an "Intellectual Property", "Approximation of Laws" or some other more obvious label. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 2:29 pm
  But they're still no fun.Which is, in part, why I really appreciated the first published opinion in 2018 from the California Court of Appeal. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm by Jamie Markham
If an officer filed a violation report before the case ended, the court would still have jurisdiction to act on it as provided in G.S. 15A-1344(f). [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 1:20 pm by Jennifer Lynch
We asked the court to recognize, as the Supreme Court did in U.S. v Carpenter, that people have a constitutional right to privacy in their physical movements. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
Contrary to the case of Breyer v Germany of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Court of Human Rights does not focus on delineating the notion of personal data with regard to dynamic IP addresses and on establishing the criteria based on which a dynamic IP address may qualify as personal data. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm
COURTS IN HUMAN RIGHTS CASES The court kicked off the new term with the second round of oral arguments in Kiobel v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:26 pm by Matthew Nelson
On December 29, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a split decision in Anglers of the AuSable, Inc. v. [read post]