Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 2441 - 2460 of 21,976
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2007, 2:29 pm
Plaintiff asserts a post-conviction constitutional right of access to DNA testing which, he asserts, might exonerate him. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:23 am
The Court noted that a solid tripping hazard is more likely than a liquid spill to constitute an open and obvious dangerous condition as a matter of law, but that there is no bright line test, and in this case the hazard was open and obvious. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 7:17 am by Steven Cohen
  Kirkland issued a report about the plaintiff after conducting a clinical interview and examination, reviewing collateral information, and administering a personality inventory test. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:52 am by Byron Shaw
Hanke, the “material contribution” test of causation applies only where it is impossible on the but-for test to prove that the defendant’s negligent conduct caused the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:38 am by Rebekah Bradway
During the final test, Hoeper "believed that the test administrators were deliberately sabotaging his testing," which caused him to get angry, use profanity, and "bl[o]w up" at one of the test administrators. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:00 am
Lightner (1990) 224 Cal.App3d 587, where the defendant psychologist had performed testing on plaintiff's family in order to testify in child custody proceedings; claims against this court expert acting in a testimonial capacity are barred. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:14 am by Stephen Bilkis
However, in order to be sufficient to establish a prima facie case of serious physical injury, the affirmation or affidavit must contain medical findings, which are based on the physician’s own examination, tests and observations and review of the record rather than manifesting only the plaintiff’s subjective complaints. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
Following the December 22, 2011 correspondence from Plaintiffs, eBossWatch.com posted an amended version of the August 3, 2010 article, entitled “Hostile Work Environment Lawsuit Filed Against Petro-Lubricant Testing Laboratories. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:35 pm by Steven Cohen
Plaintiff sued defendants for injuries caused by a head-on automobile collision. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 8:14 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Specifically, the plaintiff wanted to prove that the home contained lead paint by submitting medical tests showing that the level of lead in her blood rose 33% while she was living in the home. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:23 pm by emagraken
So this is the next part of the order:  If the appointment ends after 4:30 p.m. on the date it commences, the defendant must promptly reimburse the plaintiff for one additional night’s accommodation and $12 additional meal allowance; 3)    if there are parking expenses not included in the hotel accommodation, those are to be promptly reimbursed upon being provided with the invoicing; 4)    the plaintiff can submit actual meal expenses,… [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:13 am by Steven Cohen
  In addition, the court opines that Sero never tested his theories on similar components and he does not adequately explain why this testing could not be done. [read post]