Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Brown" Results 2441 - 2460 of 3,354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 2:29 am
  Last week  I came across the 8th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:47 pm by Amy Howe
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Some people are getting this priceless protection, and others are not, with little justification for the different treatment but just because they drew a judge who is more open to pseudonymity or because the judge found their plight to be specially sympathetic. [1] See Hundtofte v. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 12:39 pm by Swaraj Paul Barooah
The health authorities in Australia expect that the plain packaging laws would help reduce the number of people taking up tobacco use. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 11:30 am by Ron Friedmann
More law firms are now hiring people who focus on the business of the practice. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 12:30 pm by Guest Blogger
Browne Distinguished Emeritus Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylania. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am by Eugene Volokh
This can't possibly be consistent with the First Amendment; indeed, in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
” Professor Avins and the Commission were convinced that Brown v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:52 am by Transplanted Lawyer
Regular Readers here will recall that I have been critical of Governor Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Brown for not offering a spirited defense of Prop. 8 in the case of Perry v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 5:52 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Brown of the University of Virginia School of Law recently published a law review article titled: How to Marginalize Criminal Trials Without Pretrial Discovery, 55 Am. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 12:33 am
It is clear that Lazarus does not conceive of the possibility that a Roberts' Court will be anti-majoritarian in its drive to impose it radical reactionary views. for example Lazarus writes: The 19-year period from 1954 (when the court decided Brown v. [read post]