Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Price" Results 2441 - 2460 of 4,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2008, 3:58 am
At solar maxima, when the sun was at its hottest and sunspots showed, temperature was warmer, grain grew faster and prices fell. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
Exorbitant price increases by Turing and Valeant were described as outliers. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Inc.), Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. and Merck Sharp & Dohme; Cassina SpA v Alivar Srl and Galliani Host Arredamenti Srl (IPKat)   Finland Finnish trademark office changing its classification practice regarding ‘retail services’ in class 35 (Class 46)   France Paris - Size matters: a correlation between luxury products price and logo size (Class 46) Validity of 3D trade mark (? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
Inc.), Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. and Merck Sharp & Dohme; Cassina SpA v Alivar Srl and Galliani Host Arredamenti Srl (IPKat) Finland Finnish trademark office changing its classification practice regarding ‘retail services’ in class 35 (Class 46) France Paris – Size matters: a correlation between luxury products price and logo size (Class 46) Validity of 3D trade mark (? [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Defendants have included people who have never even used a computer, and many people who although they have used a computer, have never engaged in any peer to peer file sharing.Sometimes the cases are misleadingly referred to as cases against 'downloaders'; in fact the RIAA knows nothing of any downloading when it commences suit, and in many instances no downloading ever took place.It is more accurate to refer to the cases as cases against persons who paid for internet… [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am by Eric Goldman
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 8:54 am by Mario Zúñiga
District Court for the Northern District of California in its ruling in the Epic v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
After Parker v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
In an essay for Notice and Comment, Professor Zachary Price of the University of California, Hastings College of the Law cautioned that a Trump Administration loss in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 12:00 pm by Jamison Koehler
  His presentations alone are worth the price of admission. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 10:17 pm by Simon Gibbs
That there appear to be as many as two people who regularly read the Legal Costs Blog; or 2. [read post]