Search for: "U.S. v. Marshal"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 2,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Federation and Secession, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
” Justice Thurgood Marshall embraced a competing vision; it “refused to acquiesce to outdated notions of ‘liberty. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:34 pm
In this Nov. 30, 2005 file photo, an anti-abortion supporter stands next to a pro-choice demonstrator outside the U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Two former U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 1:57 pm
You can read more about the meeting in 1527 in Reformationsriksdagen i Västerås by Harald Hjärne. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm
In R. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 7:56 am
“Stem pipe” provided probable cause to search the car, despite the possibility that the pipe could have been used to ingest legal hemp products U.S. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 1:37 pm
” They are relying on the fact that the U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
While Congress exercises considerable control over the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, since the landmark decision in Marbury v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 5:02 am
And U.S. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:43 am
See id. at 649 (quoting Chief Justice Marshall in Ex parte Burr, 22 U.S. 529, 530 (1824)). [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 10:22 am
Sunset Lake The ARB also adopted its decision in Sunset Lake Owners Association v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
” But later in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 12:05 pm
The U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm
Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004). . . . [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:35 pm
Troxel v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:31 am
” Neither the Supreme Court’s earlier immigration decision in INS v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
